What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Second Edition: Revised and Updated Edition | James Paul Gee | Makes me regret not playing more video games
books:
What Video Games H...
What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. Second Edition: Revised and Updated Edition
James Paul Gee
Palgrave Macmillan
, 2007 - 256 pages
average customer review:
based on 27 reviews
view larger image
for more information click here
highly recommended
James Paul Gee begins his classic book with "I want to talk
about
video
games
--yes, even violent video games--and say some positive things about them." With this simple but explosive statement, one of America's most well-respected educators looks seriously at the good that can come from playing video games. In this
revised
edition
, new games like World of WarCraft and Half Life 2 are evaluated and theories of cognitive development are expanded. Gee looks at major cognitive activities including how individuals develop a sense of identity, how we grasp meaning, how we evaluate and follow a command, pick a role model, and perceive the world.
for more information click here
Taking games seriously
Gee's background in linguistics and current interests in education inform this discussion of
video
games
, as he clearly outlines over thirty good
learning
principles that
teach
ers can glean from the practice of gaming and apply to their classrooms. Gee's book should be commended for its detailed analysis of particular games--too often, theorists discussing games tend to shy away from minute description of their own interactions with games and go straight for lessons learned or abstract ideas garnered from gameplay. Gee also has a talent for talking openly and humorously
about
his development from non-gaming baby boomer to avid but still sometimes inept gamer.
If you're already convinced that video games are cultural objects worthy of study, Gee will only confirm your opinion. However, if you look at the book's title and can't contain a derisive snort, give Gee a chance. According to Gee, good video games (and yes, not all video games are good) model active, participatory, and embodied learning, a kind of learning often scarce in traditional school curricula. Good games demonstrate the effectiveness of pattern recognition over rule-based or rote learning, and they encourage players to reflect at a meta level not only about their own identity but also their practices, often via the formation of affinity groups both within and outside of the game world. At their best, gamers become producers, creatively "modding" their own gaming experiences and sharing information with others who take play seriously.
for more information click here
Makes me regret not playing more video games
I'd always sort of believed the "
video
games
are a waste of time" thing just because I'd heard it so much. This book is good but I couldn't understand all the technical stuff but I think I got the just of it. I actually had to write a persuasive essay on the HSPA (High School Profficiancy Assessment) agreeing or disagreeing with the hypothetical decision of some kind of governmental authority (I forget which one, congress maybe?) to ban all noneducational video games. I'd read the first few pages of the book and it helped. Now I regret ever believing that waste of time stuff.
for more information click here
Provocative and balanced
Great book and delightful read. If you are a
teach
er or work in education to help direct new initiatives with technology and
learning
, you should read this.
Good for research, not so much for general reading.
First of all, this book is not written as a general public book, it is written much more in the vein of a college graduate's analysis. Heavy discussion of the effects of
video
games
on the semiotic domain underpin the analysis. That being said, this book is a good analysis of the effects of video games on those that play them.
If you want a general public analysis of the effects of entertainment (and video games) on people, check out Steven Johnson's "Everything Bad is Good For You." This book is a deeper analysis of part of Steven Johnson's book, so it might be best as a follow-up purchase.
My biggest complaint
about
James Paul Gee's book is more with the copy editor and publisher. There are so many poorly written or incorrectly written sentences that should
have
been caught and corrected. It really affects the perceptions about the book's research.
for more information click here
reviews
:
page 1
,
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
products you might be interested in
recommendations
RISD Game.arT Course Materials List
learning
Fancy Nancy: Bonjour, Butterfly (Fancy Nancy)
Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs
Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day
Where the Wild Things Are
Open the Barn Door (A Chunky Book(R))
literacy
How Fiction Works
APA: The Easy Way!
Alphabet Juice: The Energies, Gists, and Spirits of Letters, Words, ...
A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, ...
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Sixth Edition
updated
Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy Revised and Updated
Parenting With Love And Logic (Updated and Expanded Edition)
YOU: The Owner's Manual, Updated and Expanded Edition: An Insider's ...
Patriots: Surviving the Coming Collapse: A Novel of the Turbulent ...
Understanding Exposure: How to Shoot Great Photographs with a Film or ...
search for books
what video
,
edition
,
learning
,
literacy
,
revised
,
updated
geepe.com
web
randomly chosen
VHS:
Portrait of an Assassin