about us
 
Absence of Malice | Paul Newman, Sally Field | ABSENCE OF AWESOME!
 
 


Suche DVDs:   



 Absence of Malice  

Absence of Malice
Paul Newman, Sally Field

Sony Pictures, 1998

average customer review:based on 34 reviews
view larger image
 for more information click here

     highly recommended  highly recommended




Ending one of the best I have seen

I have never seen Paul Newman take a back seat in acting untill Wilford Brimley takes charge and sets everyone straight. Best ending to a movie I have ever seen. I rewatch it every year or so and really love having it on DVD now.
Harold


ABSENCE OF AWESOME!

...and by 'Absence Of Awesome', I mean quite the opposite. This movie IS awesome! Paul Newman ignites the screen with kerosene soaked he-man sexiness. Those blue eyes may seem cold, but they burn through you like a small child using a magnified glass to burn a small ant on the pavement at recess! Sally Field is as radiant as a Jamaican sunrise as she splashes her acting abilities throughout the movie like a farmer sowing seed in his freshly plowed field! The plot is as complex as Einstien's theory of relativity, and with the same effect: once completed, both the movie and the theory of relativity result in an atomic expolsion that can bend time and space. There isn't actually an explosion at the end of the movie, per se, but perhaps in the director's cut he'll put one in. I can't sing my praises ENOUGH for this movie, but if I DID, it would be a chorus line of dancing girls kickin' out a medley of showtunes with ME as the lead, wearing a sequined blue suit and a curly moustache singing my own falsetto version of 'Workin' In a Coalmine' (The Devo Version).


 for more information click here


Commitment? To whom? For what?

When Sally Field is asked if she was "involved" with suspect Newman she answered that no it was not true but yes it was accurate. They had been lovers but her trust was in something "professional." Or was it ambition? Her trust was not in her new friend.

Sally, as a reporter who wanted to get ahead, was bent on getting "a story." Newman, in an effort to get some help against what was media harrassment, invites Sally to lunch. This turns into a budding romance or at least friendship. But when "new evidence" comes in against Newman she chooses to go after the story once again.

Newman managed to set up the local Federal and State prosecutors AND the local newspapers, for a publicity embarrassment. It worked. Sally believed her "sources" rather than Newman. She couldn't rise above her "professionalism" to believe a friend. She, too, became caught in an embarrassing trap.

The Trap is snapped shut by Wilford Brimley, playing an Assistant Attorney General of the US. Brimley's handling of the climatic face to face meeting of the various parties involved is a cinema delight not to be missed.

The movie tells something meaningful about our media dominated world view today. Our vulnerability to official and media harassment was well defined, for me, by this story.

The movie also takes a useful stab at the difficult question of how and why we accept truth.


 for more information click here


ABSENCE OF MALICE!

SEE the star of "Cool Hand Luke" and "The Sting" attack the star of "Gidget" and "The Flying Nun!" in this CRITICAL EXAMINATION of the FOURTH ESTATE! Is PAUL NEWMAN involved with organized crime or is he AN INNOCENT MAN? Does journalist SALLY FIELD care about the TRUTH or just getting the STORY? Written by former reporter KURT LUETKE, enjoy this study of the POWER and PRIVILEGE of the PRESS! SEE Wilford Brimley come in at the end and put everybody in their place! Another social commentary film from director SYDNEY POLLACK!


On The Record / Off The Record

One of the worries of journalists everywhere is to keep an protect the source. The source is where all the information comes from. Once you've got a source another point comes up: how reliable this person is. It is very easy to anyone go to a reporter tell something -- that's not necesseraly true -- and his/her statement is published. So a good professional would surely investigate and print the news once it is proved to be true. But this can happen only in a ideal world. Let's face the truth: journalist do not have too much time to comfirm or deny informations. Nowadays with the internet, the readers want new news all the time and the fight for the click has shorted the deadlines.

It is in this time of digital press that film made in the 80s' turns out to be very interesting and provocative, due to its timeless subject. Sally Field plays a reporter of a major Miami's Newspaper who has fallen in a trap. She has no qualms when having the chance to peep a file about a man accused of kidnapping and killing a working class leader. Moreover, she gets involved with this man who in the end happens to be her reliable source. Telling more than this would mean give some interesting twists of the movie.

As aforementioned, the movie tackles ethic in journalism, and, let's face it, Sally's character is not that ethical with her sources. She does most of the things that someone expected to be fair and accurate wouldn't do, like not confirming information or publishing off record statements -- plus she sleeps with her source. Some in-love hearts would justify it saying that love is above everything, but I don't agree. What kind of professional is she?

Tlaking about the movie itself, it is very entertaining. Sally Field gives a good performance, but who is great as usual is Paul Newman. His perfornance is very subtle and full of nuances. Bob Balaban is terrific and a bit hateful as agent who comes down to be the prime source to Sally's reporter, detonating a sequence of inacuratte reports.

It is impossible to watch this movie and not to rise questions like how accure all the stuff we read in newspapers, magazines, internet is; and also when is an information so important that it has to be published, even when the source asks it to ve off the record. One interesting example would be when a reporter is working on a piece about two guys missing in the sea and a Lt. tells her that there are sharks in the area. But Sally tells her not to mention it in her article, because it may scare turists, so the solution is to say that is an area with many fishes. Then how true is her piece?

All in all, nowadays, as the press has to be faster, there's less time to check information. So the readers are much more liable to read untrue stories.


 for more information click here


reviews: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, page 6, 7



products you might be interested in




recommendations

DRAMA MOVIES BASED ON COURTROOM BATTLES AND LAWYERS
Paul Newman's Best: My Picks, in Order
Movie Directors I Appreciate
Best Films of Paul Newman
Law in the Movies






absence


Paris, Texas
Absence of the Good [Region 2]
Absence of Malice
The Absence of Light
Carlton America Classic Drama Vol. 3 - 4 Movie DVD Pack (Her Own ...



malice


Pacific Heights
The Juror
Malice
MPD Psycho: The Complete Miniseries
To Die For



 



search for DVDs
absence of malice, absence, malice



Google      geepe.com    web
dvd
apparel
baby
beauty
books
camera photo
cell phones
classical music
computers
dvd
electronics
gourmet food
health personal care
kitchen
magazines
musical instruments
office products
outdoor living
computer video games
popular music
pet-supplies
software
sporting goods
tools hardware
toys-games
vhs
watches jewelry







randomly chosen


book: PowerPoint 2007: The Missing Manual